Facts About the Virginia Beach Dredge Tax:

NEW! Fact Sheet! 

NEW! Dredge Plan Analysis:

The costs are too high.

  • The Special Service District (SSD) = 51.5 cents
  • Is a self-imposed property tax increase of 55% for 16 years
  • Increases our taxes from 93 to 144.5 cents—highest in the city
  • Over twice the SSD tax rates proposed in the 2012 dredge proposals
  • SSD rate is considerably higher than other dredge proposals

Inequitable Dredge Plan: Channels inequitably distributed—properties circled pay disproportionally higher costs but are farther from the city-subsidized channel.   They pay more, but get less, while some pay a lot less and get a lot more. Why?

Exhibit A:



Inequitable dredge plan:
  • Channels inequitably distributed—properties circled pay dis-proportionally higher costs and are 100 – 300 feet from the channel
    • Do you know what your costs are, and what you are paying for?
  • Properties not near neighborhood channels may pay tens of thousands more for individual driveways to access channels
    • “driveways” costs range from $0 - $20K for each 7 year dredge cycle* ; up to $60K for some owners
  • Annual SSD costs range from $1,905 to $6,965
  • 16 year cumulative SSD costs range from $30,480 to $101,168 PLUS the cost of Individual driveways ($60K)**
  • 40% of the properties pay approximately 70% of the costs
  • Neighborhood channels dredged to the shallow cove reaches doubles the costs due to dredging cuts 3.5 to 4 feet deep
Undue risk borne by property owners:The plan is fraught with long term economic risk to you
  • Total costs to property owners not finalized until after voting
    • Chesopeian planning SSD increased 22% from estimate of 23.95 cents in 2011 to actual 29.13 cents in 2013.
    • Owners need cost estimate for driveways before vote
  • 16 years is an extraordinary length of time to make a significant financial commitment
    • Home buyers will want concessions for buying into an excessively high taxed area
    • Will reduce the volume of buyers for our properties

Exhibit B: Witchduck Individual Channel Costs (May 7 City meeting)



Calculations based on data provided from the City’s April ’14 Dredge analysis.  While some of the values in the data fields are outdated (i.e., new construction), generally we believe the data is statistically sufficient to conduct a representative analysis.  All information is available upon request.  


Exhibit C:

OPTION A, Affordable and Equitable (pay for your portions of the dredging)

Neighborhood channels include:
2, 7, 8, 11,12,17,21,22 = $2,301,611/16 years= $143,851 per year 143,851 / 6,147.09 = SSD 23.40 (this cost is very close to the 2014 Thoroughgood cove estimate (which was defeated) and near
the 2102 Witchduck and Thoroughgood SSD estimates (defeated as well).

Further cost savings will be gained by reducing Channel 2 length by up to 500 feet. As drawn on the 7 May plan it approaches several properties offering them a greater benefit than others.

Additional cost reductions could be saved by narrowing the width of some of these channels to 12 – 8 feet, vice 20 – 15 feet.

Rationale for channels selected: above channels traverse most of the wider bodies of the coves and for the most part do not cross property lines or approach docks/yards within a few hundred feet.

Channel 6 should be funded by the city. For other dredge projects the city has funded up to over 20% of the cost. For the 7 May plan, the city only funds 5.5%. Extending the city’s spur to include channel 6 will bring the city’s share to about 10%.

This option significantly reduces the shared costs of the SSD, shifts the burden to the property owners to pay for their portions of what they want dredged, and does not unfairly dredge close to some properties at the expense of others. Neighbor property owners could band together to fund and design neighbor driveways to their own specifications and needs, i.e., widths, depths, lengths. This would not burden other owners and makes more equitable.



Exhibit D:
OPTION B The Equitable, costly plan (everyone gets near access to channels)

Everyone gets a channel so that no property owners are exploited and everyone minimizes their costs of  a driveway.

This entails adding up to 9 additional channels ranging from distances of 100 – 300 feet.  See green dotted lines 1 – 9. 

This option corrects the unfairness of the 7 May plan on determining which properties get channels or not.  

The additional costs would be similar to channels 5,20, 23, 24 -- all costing approximately $30K for each dredging.   Note:  these values are higher than the $20K stated by the city in the

Old Donation Policy letter, which calls into the question that estimate’s accuracy. This is why owners need to be provided an estimate of any driveways prior to voting to make an informed decision.  

This would increase the cost to:

$30K x 9 channels x 3 dredgings =  $810,000

$810,000 + $5,068,357 = $5,878,357 / 16 years = $367,397

367,397 / 6,147.09 =  59.76 cents SSD

Compared to individual SSD for coves 2 (73.34) and 3 (56.29)  this cost does not seem that unreasonable.  

For property owners that would have to pay for their own driveways, this cost is probably more  affordable than having to pay the SSD and the additional driveway costs of $60K. 

 

Many cost saving measures could be incorporated into this option and the others as well to lower the SSD:  

City spur includes channel 6
widths of smaller channels reduced to 8 – 10 ft
depths of some channels reduced by 1 foot
some owners say they don’t want a channel and are willing to forego deep water access to their property, but are still part of  the SSD


Exhibit E:

OPTION C, Each Cove separately (The right to determine your own neighborhood plan)


Each cove’s neighbors determines their needs and requirements for designing the specifications for their cove and they fund with a combination of SSD and driveways


The city spur includes channel 6


Each cove decides widths, depths and lengths of channels


No cove imposes or exploits another cove


The costs accurately reflect the costs incurred by

each community and the burden is on the cove

neighbors’


Ultimately, the costs are borne by each neighbor

to pay their costs.  This options takes into account

each property owners decision to buy and live

where they chose to live.  The cost of altering the

geography and ecology is borne by that cove’s

neighbors 



Exhibit F: Cove 1 Analysis


Channel costs

              2  $682,358

              3    211,959

              4    162,771

              5      96,482

 Total      $1,153,570

$1,153,570/16 years = $72,098 annual cost

Average property value:  $640,028

Property range:   $261,900 – $1,140,800

Total assessment 25 properties =  $16,000,700  $16,000,700/100 = 160,007 x .01 = $1600.07

$72,098 / 1,600.07 = 45.06 cents SSD

For channel 2 only, SSD = 26.6 cents

     
Exhibit G: Cove 2 Analysis


Channel costs  1/3 of 6[1]   $100,710

  17    301,616

  18    148,616

  19    168,791

  20    114,531

                     Total          $843,264

 $843,264/16 = $52,704 annual cost

Average property value:   $598,816 (excludes 2

 tax relief properties)

Property assessment Range $422,600 –$714,600

Total assessment 12 properties (2 tax relief 

  properties excluded) =  $7,185,800

  $7,185,800 / 100 = 71,858 x .01 = 718.58

  $52,704 / 718.58 = 73.34 cents SSD


Cove 2 SSD costs the most of all the coves and drives up the total costs for the whole project. Observations:
  • requires dredging up to 3.5 - 4 feet deep for channels.
  • channels are within tens of feet to properties/piers, significantly reducing need for driveways.
  • 2 properties are tax relief – they do not pay the SSD and costs are absorbed by all other property owners.
  • The property assessments are significantly below the project average of $749,648.
Conclusion: The only affordable way cove 2 can dredge is by getting all the coves involved and shift the burden of its costs to the other property owners. Cove 2 properties pay the least and receive the most benefit as they get neighborhood channels funded by the SSD, instead of driveways funded by owners.

[1] Coves 2, 3, 4 all need channel 6, so divided equally. 



Exhibit H: Cove 3 Analysis

Channel costs 

1/3 of 6  $100,710

  21          117,596

  22          122,670

  23          105,917

  24            90,466

  25          131,123

  Total     $668,482

$668,482 / 16 = $41,780 annual cost

Average property value:  $686,93

Assessment range $279,600 – 1,114,800

Total assessment 11 properties $7,556,300

$7,556,300 / 100 = 75,563 x .01= 755.633

$41,780 / 755.63 = 55.29 cents SSD



Exhibit I:

Channel costs 

1/3 of 6   $100,710

1               163,834

7               280,725

8               378,391

9               253,949

10             144,489

11             229,178

12             189,077

13             171,504

14             266,336

Total    $2,178,193


$2,178,193 / 16 = $ 136,137 annual cost

Average  property value $882,662;

Assessment range $265,200 – $1,361,100

Total assessments 34 properties = $30,010,500

(excludes 1 tax relief property)

$30,010,500 / 100 = 300,105  x .01 = 3,001.05

136,137 / 3,001.05 = 45.36 SSD cents  


Exhibit J:

SSD effects on Witchduck / Thoroughgood Properties

 2014* Property
assessment.

NOTE: 2015 assessments Increased 3.6%**

 2014
Tax


93 cents Tax + SDD
51.5 =$144.5
(55% tax increase)
 
X 16 years
Through 2031

(not counting change in city tax rate or further assessments)
 
Additional
Cost for
Driveways
(thousands)

Total for yrs 2,
9 & 16***

 
Potential SSD and Driveway costs
 
 
 $516K 4803 7444 42,256 0-60k 102,256 
 $859K 7994 12390 70,336 0-60k 130,336 
 1.013M 9422 14604 82,912 0-60k 142,912 
 $1.236M 11497 17820 101,168 0-60k 161,166 

Sum is estimated true cost over 16 years, not counting increases to assessments and/or tax rates


* City of Va Bch Properties:   http://cvb.manatron.com/Tabs/PropertySearch.aspx 

** The Virginian Pilot, Property Values rise in Virginia Beach, April 13, 2014

*** 7 May Preliminary Plan depicts numerous “Neighborhood channels” that did not appear in 2012 plans

City of Virginia Beach, Old Donation Policy Report, Sept 10, 2010, driveways range from $5K – 20K


Download this information here


Background:

On May 7, 2014, the city of Virginia Beach presented a dredge tax plan for Witchduck and Thoroughgood that:

• Increases our taxes by 55% (highest in the city) for 16 years.

• Costs each resident a minimum of $31K – to over $103K.

• Makes you pay for driveway channels for a select few residents’ properties, while others will have to pay up to tens of thousands of dollars more for their own private driveways.

• All property owners must exercise due diligence before signing the willingness petition as you are granting the city the rights to your property and sole design of the project. (See "Legal Document" tab above).

• All the risks are borne by the residents, while the city benefits from increased property assessments.


Residents would save 50% of the costs with these changes:

• No taxpayer-funded "neighborhood channels" that go right to properties the way the privately funded "driveways" do.

• Reduce lengths and widths of channels paid for by taxpayers.

• Break up the neighborhoods/coves separately so that each pays their own respective costs.  

                                        or else

• increase the number of neighborhood channels so that everyone receives the same benefit as the select residents.


You should know the exact costs and the rights you have to sign away before you send back a single letter or sign a petition.





This website is sponsored by the waterfront residents of the Thoroughgood and Witchduck Coves that are concerned with the costs, equitableness of the dredging plans, risks borne by the residents, and to the impacts to our local wetlands.

We endeavor to provide factual information for our neighbors so that they can make informed decisions and to provide a forum for those who want to have their voice heard.


Reach us: contact@dredgetax.com